Weekly SA Mirror
BRICS ECONOMIC POTENTIAL AND ITS IMPACT ON DE-DOLLARIZATION

BRICS ECONOMIC POTENTIAL AND ITS IMPACT ON DE-DOLLARIZATION

PACT: BRICS has become quite important in global economic dynamics because of the combination of economic power they have

By Sofwan F. Arrasyid

The global economy always moves in ever-evolving dynamics, every economic actor, whether countries, groups of countries, multinational private companies or international organizations, has a significant role. One group that is increasingly prominent in the world economic landscape is the BRICS: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

This group, consisting of countries with rapidly developing economies, has been the subject of great attention in the context of dedollarization, a shift away from the dominant use of the United States dollar in international trade.

BRICS has become quite important in global economic dynamics because of the combination of economic power they have. With its large population, abundant natural resources and rapid economic growth, BRICS has become a motor of world economic growth and plays a role in shaping global policy. One of the important initiatives they undertook was strengthening intra-group trade using their respective national currencies to reduce dependence on the US dollar, known as dedollarization efforts. This illustrates the intention of the BRICS countries to overhaul the international financial structure which is currently dominated by the dollar.

BRICS brings tremendous economic potential. For example, in 2022, the combined GDP of this group will reach about $18.6 trillion, which is close to a quarter of total global GDP. China, as the dominant power in the economic sector of this group, has a significant role in increasing BRICS’ bargaining power in international economic affairs. In the same year, China alone contributed more than 70% of BRICS GDP growth.

Rapid economic growth, large infrastructure investment, strong exports and high domestic consumption have been the main factors driving China’s major contribution to BRICS economic growth. In addition, China as one of the countries with the largest consumer market in the world has a significant impact on the export goals and economic growth of other BRICS countries.

Then on the same hand, Russia is one of the largest energy producers in the world and has abundant natural resource reserves, especially oil and gas. This contribution is important in supporting global energy needs and is a major factor in energy cooperation between BRICS members.

Russia also plays a role in technological and industrial development, especially in the defense, aerospace and nuclear technology sectors. Russia has expertise and potential in these sectors, which can make a major contribution to the development of high technology among the BRICS countries.

In addition, Russia is also involved in strengthening trade cooperation between BRICS countries, including in efforts to reduce dependence on the US dollar in international trade.

Russia supports currency diversification in bilateral trade with BRICS countries, which is an important step in supporting depolarization. In the context of the New Development Bank (NDB), Russia also plays a role in contributing funds to the development bank to support infrastructure projects in BRICS member countries.

Apart from China and Russia, India has also shown steady growth, becoming one of the largest markets in the world with a large population and rapid economic growth. Meanwhile Brazil and Russia, despite experiencing some economic turbulence, still have an important role in the energy and natural resources sector which can influence global market dynamics.

In recent years, through their economic power and influence, the BRICS have collaborated to create alternatives in terms of international trade and finance, which can directly reduce dependence on the US dollar. They have promoted the use of their respective national currencies in trade, reduced dependence on foreign currencies, and strengthened their economic integration.

One of the most significant steps was the establishment of the New Development Bank (NDB) by BRICS in 2014. The NDB aims to provide loans for infrastructure development projects in member countries as well as outside BRICS, using national currencies instead of US dollars. This is a major step in overhauling the international financial structure which has been dominated by institutions such as the IMF and World Bank which use the dollar as the main currency.

According to data from the World Bank, by 2022, intra-BRICS trade will have reached more than $500 billion. Although this figure is still far below global trade, its steady growth shows a tendency to reduce dependence on foreign currencies, especially the US dollar.

Additionally, BRICS efforts to strengthen their financial integration have involved currency swap agreements and the use of alternative payment networks to facilitate bilateral trade in national currencies, reducing the need for transactions in dollars.

Reducing dependence on the US dollar has a significant impact on the global economy. This can reduce the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations on trade and economic stability. By using national currencies in trade, BRICS can protect themselves from volatility that may arise due to US monetary policy or global market turmoil.

In addition, the move towards dedollarization taken by BRICS could also challenge the hegemony of the US dollar in terms of monetary policy, international trade and world currency reserves. This could lead to reform of a more balanced and fair global financial system, reducing the risks associated with over-reliance on a single currency.

BRICS with its huge economic potential has become an important motor in pushing dedollarization. The steps taken by the group to increase intra-BRICS trade in national currencies are an important step in reducing dependence on the US dollar.

Although a major shift away from dollar dominance may not occur in a short time, the steps taken by BRICS have made a major contribution to overhauling the international financial structure which has been too dependent on the US dollar. In the long term, dedollarization that occurs could be an impetus for a more stable and balanced global financial system. – Modern Diplomacy

 

Comment

PEACE – NOT BOMBS

The festive season is certainly upon us, and with it the characteristic festive cheer fostering among us the spirit of goodwill peace, joy and love.

Yet, while we are seized by its euphoria, let us spare a thought for the millions throughout the world eluded by this familial spirit, those trapped in dire life-threatening circumstances beyond their control; stranded by wars not of their making, displaced from their homes, confronting a bare existence, in constant terror of death lurking about.

As they navigate lives literally hanging by a thread, the question must be posed, in exasperation: whither humanity? Indeed, when blood is arbitrarily spilled, in pursuit of dark agendas spurred by unconscionable self-interest at grave human cost.

Again, we ask the question again – whither humanity – not because we expect answers, none will be preferred anyway, but out of sheer despair and horror at the wanton large-scale destruction of human life, homes, communities, countries; to shape unveiled future plans to shore up a new order, mere mortals, engineered by forward planners who arbitrarily arrogate themselves the power and authority to rule over the rest of humanity, mere mortals. Of which, proving that humanity has reached an irrevocable point in its propensity for self-destruction, where – prioritising peace over armament in resolving geopolitical disagreements – is no longer a viable option, except to submit to the logic of a looming rules-based order by laying its foundations on the bed of gusting rivers of blood, to ensure their fierce will prevails at all costs.

Still, it would seem it matters very little that the current wars may well be casting a dark shadow over the coming generations in bequeathing to them millions of descendants of countless internecine wars – the burden of children of the wars, bludgeoned by an existence void of peace and stability, yet raised to face the promise of an uncertain future, broken-spirited by an incorrigible example of inhumanity to humanity experienced on an unimaginable scale.

Indeed, future generations predicated upon a blood-soaked lineage may well be prone to tread the same path swept by ill-winds generated by their war-mongering forebears – a forward debt from which they may well find hard to escape. The reality is that history, with all its necessary evils or  purported goodness, tends repeats itself, and so should it be self-evident that whirlwinds we sow now shall be reaped by the unsuspecting coming generations – a truism that often eludes those who have the power to stop the needless bloodletting.

To this end, Robert Anton Wilson’s counsel about the futility of war, is inescapable, that: “Every war results from the struggle for markets and spheres of influence, and every war is sold to the public by professional liars and totally sincere religious maniacs, as a Holy Crusade to save God and Goodness from Satan and Evil”.

Indeed, we need no more sincere warmongers.

Published on the 129th Edition

Get E-Copy

WeeklySA_Admin